-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - OCaml
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 452 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - Rust
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - OCaml
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
Affects PMD Version: 6.28
Description:
UseCollectionIsEmptyRule fails with NPE if:
- object under test is an enum
- it has a
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - Go
-
Updated
Oct 27, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Oct 16, 2020 - Ruby
-
Updated
Oct 23, 2020 - TypeScript
In the past we have made PR's to Piranha to support additional usage patterns. Also, thanks to all the new functionalities added to Piranha Java last few months.
We are in the final stage of putting Piranha to pre-production for our java based micro services. We have hit this two blockers and need your support for this:
**Case 1: Tests using the moc
Bug report
What's wrong
for kind, (model_class, list_model_class) in mapping.items():
... # do things...triggers WPS405 and WPS414.
405 says:
Use regular ast.Name variables. Or tuple of ast.Name variables. Star names are also fine.
I'm using a name and a tuple with two names. This should be OK right?
414 says to avoid side-effects. There are no si
-
Updated
Oct 12, 2020
-
Updated
Oct 24, 2020 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
-
Updated
Oct 22, 2020 - Dockerfile
-
Updated
May 19, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Oct 18, 2020 - PHP
There is a gap in the docs about managing your installation using github settings and imgbot settings
Main points:
For managing your imgbot installation check out github's docs.
They offer 2 options for managing this. You can select which repositories you want it installed in, or you can choose "all repositories including all future repositories".
You can log in and see your repos and req
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
-
Updated
Jun 25, 2019 - Vim script
-
Updated
Oct 26, 2020 - Ruby
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Python
Code quality apps
Sider
Automatically analyze pull request against custom per-project rulesets and best practices
Better Code Hub
A Benchmarked Definition of Done for Code Quality with BetterCodeHub
Lucidchart Connector
Insert a public link to a Lucidchart diagram so team members can quickly understand an issue or pull request
codebeat
Code review expert on demand. Automated for mobile and web
Restyled.io
Restyle Pull Requests as they're opened
Datree
Policy enforcement solution for confident and compliant code
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Codecov | Code Coverage Reports
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request
LGTM
Find and prevent zero-days and other critical bugs, with customizable alerts and automated code review
Codacy
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
CodeScene
A quality visualization tool to identify and prioritize technical debt and evaluate your organizational efficiency
DeepScan
Advanced static analysis for automatically finding runtime errors in JavaScript code
Imgbot
A GitHub app that optimizes your images
Code Inspector
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
DeepSource
Identify and fix bug risks, anti-patterns, performance issues, and security flaws using static analysis


We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive