close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20170302200817/https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/congress-trump-score/frank-a-lobiondo/

Frank A. LoBiondo

R
Republican representative for New Jersey’s 2nd District
Trump score
How often LoBiondo votes in line with Trump's position
Trump margin
Trump's share of the vote in the 2016 election in New Jersey’s 2nd District minus Clinton's
Predicted score
How often LoBiondo is expected to support Trump based on Trump's 2016 margin
Trump plus-minus
Difference between LoBiondo’s actual and predicted Trump-support scores
85.7%
+4.6 
78.9%
+6.8 
Trump score
How often LoBiondo votes in line with Trump's position
85.7%
Trump margin
Trump's share of the vote in the 2016 election in New Jersey’s 2nd District minus Clinton's
+4.6 
Predicted score
How often LoBiondo is expected to support Trump based on Trump's 2016 margin
78.9%
Trump plus-minus
Difference between LoBiondo’s actual and predicted Trump-support scores
+6.8 
DateMeasureTrump PositionLoBiondo VoteAgree with Trump?Likelihood of agreementPlus-minus
Feb. 16 Repeal of a rule requiring state and local governments to distribute federal funds to qualified health centers even if they perform abortions (230-188)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
79.3%
Plus-minus
+20.7
Feb. 15 Repeal of a Department of Labor rule on drug testing of applicants for unemployment compensation (236-189)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
82.5%
Plus-minus
+17.5
Feb. 7 Repeal of a Department of Education rule on teacher preparation programs (240-181)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
80.2%
Plus-minus
+19.8
Feb. 7 Repeal of a Department of Education rule on school accountability (234-190)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
77.4%
Plus-minus
+22.6
Feb. 7 Repeal of changes to Bureau of Land Management planning rules (234-186)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
No
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
78.6%
Plus-minus
-78.6
Feb. 3 Repeal of a rule requiring energy companies to reduce waste and emissions (221-191)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
73.1%
Plus-minus
+26.9
Feb. 2 Repeal of a rule requiring the Social Security Administration to submit information to the national background-check system (235-180)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
83.2%
Plus-minus
+16.8
Feb. 2 Repeal of a rule requiring some federal contractors to report labor violations (236-187)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
80.7%
Plus-minus
+19.3
Feb. 1 Repeal of the stream protection rule (228-194)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
No
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
74.7%
Plus-minus
-74.7
Feb. 1 Repeal of a rule requiring energy companies to disclose payments to foreign governments (235-187)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
77.4%
Plus-minus
+22.6
Jan. 24 Permanent ban on the use of federal funds for abortion or health coverage that includes abortions (238-183)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
82.0%
Plus-minus
+18.0
Jan. 13 Waiver allowing James Mattis to become secretary of defense (268-151)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
86.2%
Plus-minus
+13.8
Jan. 13 Budget resolution to repeal the Affordable Care Act (227-198)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
67.8%
Plus-minus
+32.2
Jan. 5 Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2017 (237-187)
Trump Position
support
LoBiondo Vote
Yes
Agree with Trump?
Image
Likelihood of agreement
82.1%
Plus-minus
+17.9
Average
85.7%
78.9%
+6.8

Members’ “likelihood of agreement” scores on each vote are calculated using a regression for which the input is Trump's 2016 vote margin in every member's state or district and the output is the probability that a member will vote for the bill. The plus-minus on each vote is the difference between the member's vote (100 percent for a “yes,” 0 percent for a “no”) and the likelihood of agreement. Averages do not include missed votes. How this works »

CommentsAdd Comment